... xo 4 T ( 1 + Mo ) ▽ Moto + o + π MOL arc sin 1 ΔΡ 2 ( 1 - x ) -to ( 1 + Mo ) to ( 1 - Mo ) ! ( AP ) , α = 8 -- M = arc sin 2xo - to ( 1 - Mo ) ( 1 + Mo ) to + ( A6c ) ( A6d ) to - xo π ; —EF ( 4 , k ' ) — 2 90/4 Marc sin 16 xo - 1 + Moto ...
... ( 1 ) i = 1 mn + 2gabe ble ; 1 ) ele ; 2 ) ] 771 169 The third term is ( y2 - y , ) - dependent , so that , as argued ... xo ) ] 2 ( 4.3 ) = - ( 4c45 ) 2 ; and then performing Q and S transformations with independent parameters ( -o ( 1 ) ...
... xo of in a neighborhood of to . Then ( 3.104 ) does not hold , that is , r + 1. On the other hand , there exist weight functions w having an isolated zero at xo of ( exact ) order r such that ( 3.104 ) holds , i.e. , w is in W ( p , J ) ...
... 1 . ( i ) Let Xo = -1 . Then = f ( x ) – f ( xo ) = lim XXO 0 – 0 lim x → xo – X – ( -1 ) = - : 0 , X – Xo f ( x ) – f ( xo ) lim XX0 + X – Xo = ( 1 + x ) - 0 x – ( -1 ) lim x → X0 + = = 1 . = = Hence , f ' ( - 1 ) = 0 and f ( -1 ) = 1 .
... 1 0 : " + 1g → CA ( Ug ) 0 ( хо ^ X1 ^ ^ xn ) = xo & e ( x1 ^ • • • ^ Xn ) . Because we are working modulo the image of 1 —t , 0 is well defined . The following result is implicit in the proof of [ 7 , 10.2.4 ] for r = 1 , A = Ug ...